Hammond v. State

864 So. 2d 586, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 930, 2004 WL 231273
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 4, 2004
DocketNo. 3D03-1344
StatusPublished

This text of 864 So. 2d 586 (Hammond v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hammond v. State, 864 So. 2d 586, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 930, 2004 WL 231273 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Anthony Hammond appeals his conviction of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon challenging the constitutionality of section 775.051, Florida Statutes (1999). For the reasons stated in Barrett v. State, 862 So.2d 44 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003) and Cue v. State, 834 So.2d 378 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003), review denied, 847 So.2d 975 (Fla.2003), we reject this argument. We likewise find no merit in Hammond’s two other arguments.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cuc v. State
834 So. 2d 378 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Barrett v. State
862 So. 2d 44 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
864 So. 2d 586, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 930, 2004 WL 231273, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hammond-v-state-fladistctapp-2004.