Hammond v. State
713 So. 2d 1094, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 8519, 1998 WL 396219
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hammond v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 660 So. 2d 1152 →
Opinion
In this appeal filed pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), by the appellant, Eddie Hammond, we find no error in regard to the convictions and therefore affirm. We affirm the sentences except for the condition of community control which requires appellant to pay forty dollars each month for costs of supervision. The record on appeal indicates that this condition was improperly imposed. See Reyes v. State, 655 So.2d 111 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). We, therefore, strike the condition.
Affirmed as modified.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hammond v. State, 713 So. 2d 1094, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 8519, 1998 WL 396219 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).
713 So. 2d 1094 (Hammond v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Reyes v. State
655 So. 2d 111 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)