Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Hammond v. State

Hammond v. State

595 So. 2d 1113, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 3911, 1992 WL 67925
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hammond v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 591 So. 2d 1119 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 6, 1992·No. No. 91-1214·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We strike that portion of the sentencing order which authorizes “Probation and Parole” to set the amount of restitution, and we remand for the trial court to set the amount of restitution. See McCaskill v. State, 520 So.2d 664 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988). In all other respects, the judgment and sentence are affirmed. See Jefferson v. State, 595 So.2d 38 (Fla.1992).

BOOTH, BARFIELD and ALLEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hammond v. State, 595 So. 2d 1113, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 3911, 1992 WL 67925 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

595 So. 2d 1113 (Hammond v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jefferson v. State
595 So. 2d 38 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1992)
McCaskill v. State
520 So. 2d 664 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)