Hammond v. State

752 So. 2d 559, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 30, 2000 Fla. LEXIS 5, 2000 WL 5005
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided January 6, 2000·No. No. SC94780·Published

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

We initially accepted the decision in Hammond v. State, 727 So.2d 979 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999), for review based on alleged express and direct conflict with our opinion in Trotter v. State, 576 So.2d 691 (Fla.1990). Upon closer examination and after oral argument in this case, we find that jurisdiction was improvidently granted. Accordingly, we dismiss the petition for review.

It is so ordered.

HARDING, C.J., and SHAW, WELLS, PARIENTE, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., concur.

PARIENTE, J., concurs specially with an opinion.

ANSTEAD, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hammond v. State, 752 So. 2d 559, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 30, 2000 Fla. LEXIS 5, 2000 WL 5005 (Fla. 2000).

752 So. 2d 559 (Hammond v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Steinhorst v. State
412 So. 2d 332 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1982)
Trotter v. State
576 So. 2d 691 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1990)
Hammond v. State
727 So. 2d 979 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Rodriguez v. State
609 So. 2d 493 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1992)