Hammond v. Sheriff, Mineral County

532 P.2d 1030, 91 Nev. 176, 1975 Nev. LEXIS 579
Nevada Supreme Court·Decided March 24, 1975·No. No. 8125·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

OPINION

Per Curiam:

This appeal challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to warrant prosecution of appellant for possession of marijuana. The only probative or demonstrable evidence of record, suggesting that contraband even existed in proximity to appellant, are three photographs a police officer took of a plant growing in a [177]*177garden at the home of appellant’s father, with whom appellant resides.

Deeming this evidence insufficient to hold appellant for trial, we reverse, with instructions to grant a writ of habeas corpus.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hammond v. Sheriff, Mineral County, 532 P.2d 1030, 91 Nev. 176, 1975 Nev. LEXIS 579 (Neb. 1975).

532 P.2d 1030 (Hammond v. Sheriff, Mineral County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mills v. Sheriff
565 P.2d 327 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1977)
Feibel v. Sheriff
546 P.2d 1003 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1976)
Ursino v. Sheriff, Washoe County
537 P.2d 316 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1975)