Home/The Superior Court of New York City/Hammond v. Schultze

Hammond v. Schultze

13 Jones & S. 611
CourtThe Superior Court of New York City
DecidedJune 13, 1879
StatusPublished

This text of 13 Jones & S. 611 (Hammond v. Schultze) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hammond v. Schultze, 13 Jones & S. 611 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1879).

Opinion

Freedman, J.,

wrote (holding as above), for affirmance with costs, as to the defendant, Christian Schultze, and for a reversal and new trial as to the other defendants, costs to abide the event.

Sedgwick, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
13 Jones & S. 611, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hammond-v-schultze-nysuperctnyc-1879.