Home/The Superior Court of New York City/Hammond v. Schultze

Hammond v. Schultze

13 Jones & S. 611
The Superior Court of New York City·Decided June 13, 1879·Published

Opinion

Freedman, J.,

wrote (holding as above), for affirmance with costs, as to the defendant, Christian Schultze, and for a reversal and new trial as to the other defendants, costs to abide the event.

Sedgwick, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hammond v. Schultze, 13 Jones & S. 611 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1879).

13 Jones & S. 611 (Hammond v. Schultze) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.