Hammond v. Perdue

604 F. App'x 315
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 27, 2015·No. No. 15-6292·Published

Opinion

[316] Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Mark Hammond, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. .He also appeals the court’s order denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hammond v. Perdue, No. 1:14-CV-00047-IMK-JSK, 2015 WL 114359 (N.D.W.Va. Jan. 8, 2015; Feb. 9, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hammond v. Perdue, 604 F. App'x 315 (4th Cir. 2015).

604 F. App'x 315 (Hammond v. Perdue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Power to grant writ
28 U.S.C. § 2241