Hammond v. M'Lea

2 Johns. Ch. 493, 1817 N.Y. LEXIS 217, 1817 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 74
CourtNew York Court of Chancery
DecidedJune 25, 1817
StatusPublished

This text of 2 Johns. Ch. 493 (Hammond v. M'Lea) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hammond v. M'Lea, 2 Johns. Ch. 493, 1817 N.Y. LEXIS 217, 1817 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 74 (N.Y. 1817).

Opinion

The Chancellor

[ * 495 ]

said, he was inclined to think, that the act did not apply to the case, as the goods in question were not here at the death of Williams, but were shipped from the Brazils, and consigned to.the defendants, after his death. If the plaintiff had any rights, he must be left to pursue them at law, under his letters of administration, in case they should be granted. It would *not be proper to interfere with the conflicting claims of third persons, in this way, unless in a case clearly within the act.

Injunction dissolved.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Johns. Ch. 493, 1817 N.Y. LEXIS 217, 1817 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 74, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hammond-v-mlea-nychanct-1817.