Hammond v. Jacques

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Hammond v. Jacques

73 S.E. 542, 10 Ga. App. 286, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 463

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 15, 1912

Docket3371

StatusPublished

This text of 73 S.E. 542 (Hammond v. Jacques) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hammond v. Jacques, 73 S.E. 542, 10 Ga. App. 286, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 463 (Ga. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

Russell, J.

It not appearing to the satisfaction of the court that the opposite party .was served with notice of the depositions admitted in evidence, and it subsequently appearing, upon the hearing of the motion for a new trial, that the attorney who was notified did not in fact represent the defendant at the time that the notice of the taking of the depositions was given to him, it was not error to grant a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Russell, J.

It not appearing to the satisfaction of the court that the opposite party .was served with notice of the depositions admitted in evidence, and it subsequently appearing, upon the hearing of the motion for a new trial, that the attorney who was notified did not in fact represent the defendant at the time that the notice of the taking of the depositions was given to him, it was not error to grant a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

73 S.E. 542, 10 Ga. App. 286, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 463, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hammond-v-jacques-gactapp-1912.