Hammond v. Hammond

801 So. 2d 988, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 17472, 2001 WL 1580275
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 12, 2001·No. No. 1D01-1739·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

BARFIELD, J.

The former husband appeals the trial court’s order denying a request for modification of child support and visitation. We find no error in the denial of the petition for modification, and affirm as to that point. In denying the former wife’s motion for attorney’s fees, however, the trial court’s order fails to make proper findings regarding whether each party has the ability to pay his or her own attorney’s fees. Absent such a finding, the denial of fees is erroneous because of the apparent substantial disparity in the income of the parties. Hyatt v. Hyatt, 672 So.2d 74 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). On remand, the trial court should make the proper findings regarding attorney’s fees.

REVERSED in part and REMANDED.

VAN NORTWICK and POLSTON, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hammond v. Hammond, 801 So. 2d 988, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 17472, 2001 WL 1580275 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

801 So. 2d 988 (Hammond v. Hammond) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gaetani-Slade v. Slade
852 So. 2d 343 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)