Hammond v. Hammond
198 F.2d 529, 91 U.S. App. D.C. 100, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 3199
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedJune 26, 1952
Docket11028
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 198 F.2d 529 (Hammond v. Hammond) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hammond v. Hammond, 198 F.2d 529, 91 U.S. App. D.C. 100, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 3199 (D.C. Cir. 1952).
Opinion
In the absence of sexual intercourse between appellant and appellee, her continuing for a few weeks to live in the same house with him after she knew of his adultery was not condonation and did not bar her divorce suit. Boyce v. Boyce, 80 U.S.App.D.C. 355, 153 F.2d 229. We have examined appellant’s other contentions but find no error.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Ramos v. Ramos
291 A.2d 198 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1972)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
198 F.2d 529, 91 U.S. App. D.C. 100, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 3199, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hammond-v-hammond-cadc-1952.