Hammond v. Hammond

198 F.2d 529, 91 U.S. App. D.C. 100, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 3199
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided June 26, 1952·No. 11028·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In the absence of sexual intercourse between appellant and appellee, her continuing for a few weeks to live in the same house with him after she knew of his adultery was not condonation and did not bar her divorce suit. Boyce v. Boyce, 80 U.S.App.D.C. 355, 153 F.2d 229. We have examined appellant’s other contentions but find no error.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hammond v. Hammond, 198 F.2d 529, 91 U.S. App. D.C. 100, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 3199 (D.C. Cir. 1952).

198 F.2d 529 (Hammond v. Hammond) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ramos v. Ramos
291 A.2d 198 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1972)