Hammond v. Commissioner of Correction

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Hammond v. Commissioner of Correction

742 A.2d 358, 251 Conn. 919, 1999 Conn. LEXIS 412

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided November 18, 1999·No. SC 16220·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The petitioner Martin Hammond’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 54 Conn. [920]*920App. 11 (AC 17784), is granted, limited to the following issues:

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16220. Temmy Ann Pieszak, supervisory assistant public defender, in support of the petition. Decided November 18, 1999

“1. Whether the Appellate Court properly interpreted General Statutes § 18-98d?

“2. Whether the Appellate Court properly recast the issue on appeal, concluding that it had not been adequately briefed?”

SULLIVAN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The petitioner Martin Hammond’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 54 Conn. [920]*920App. 11 (AC 17784), is granted, limited to the following issues:

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16220. Temmy Ann Pieszak, supervisory assistant public defender, in support of the petition. Decided November 18, 1999

“1. Whether the Appellate Court properly interpreted General Statutes § 18-98d?

“2. Whether the Appellate Court properly recast the issue on appeal, concluding that it had not been adequately briefed?”

SULLIVAN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Hammond v. Commissioner of Correction, 742 A.2d 358, 251 Conn. 919, 1999 Conn. LEXIS 412 (Colo. 1999).

Pincite

742 A.2d 358 (Hammond v. Commissioner of Correction) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related