Hammond v. Cline

84 N.E. 827, 170 Ind. 452, 1908 Ind. LEXIS 41
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided May 26, 1908·No. No. 21,090·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

[455] cannot be enforced by the receiver of an insolvent corporation for the benefit of the creditors. Runner v. Dwiggins (1897), 147 Ind. 238, 36 L. R. A. 645, and authorities cited; Wallace v. Milligan (1887), 110 Ind. 498; Gainey v. Gilson (1897) , 149 Ind. 58. See, also, Hale v. Allinson (1903), 188 U. S. 56, 23 Sup. Ct. 244, 47 L. Ed. 380; Evans v. Nellis (1902), 187 U. S. 271, 23 Sup. Ct. 74, 47 L. Ed. 173; Hancock Nat. Bank v. Ellis (1898), 172 Mass. 39, 51 N. E. 207, 42 L. R. A. 396, 70 Am. St. 232; Colton v. Mayer (1900), 90 Md. 711, 45 Atl. 874, 47 L. R. A. 617, 78 Am. St. 456; McLaughlin v. Kimball (1899), 20 Utah 254, 58 Pac. 685, Am. St. 908; Wincock v. Turpin (1880), 96 Ill. 135; Farnsworth v. Wood (1883), 91 N. Y. 308; Burns v. Trail (1898) , 89 Fed. 641; 3 Thompson, Corporations, §§3560, 3561; Cook, Stockholders (2d ed.), §218; 2 Beach, Priv. Corp., §716. This case belongs to the same class as the cases just cited.

5.

It does not, as maintained by appellant, come within the operation of §270 Burns 1908, §269 R. S. 1881, which provides that those united in interest must be joined as plaintiffs, and when numerous one may sue for the benefit of all. This is not an action by one creditor for numerous creditors.

We think the demurrer was rightly sustained. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hammond v. Cline, 84 N.E. 827, 170 Ind. 452, 1908 Ind. LEXIS 41 (Ind. 1908).

84 N.E. 827 (Hammond v. Cline) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Knauer v. Jonathon Roberts Financial Group, Inc.
348 F.3d 230 (Seventh Circuit, 2003)
Jackson v. Bowie
114 S.W.2d 342 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1938)
Sherman & Ellis, Inc. v. Indianapolis Castings Co.
144 N.E. 17 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1924)