Hammond v. City of Miami

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Hammond v. City of Miami

396 So. 2d 237, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19069

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 31, 1981

DocketNo. 80-1289

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 396 So. 2d 237 (Hammond v. City of Miami) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hammond v. City of Miami, 396 So. 2d 237, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19069 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The final judgment appealed from is affirmed on the basis that: (1) the underlying proceeding before the Retirement Board of the City of Miami seeking accidental disability pension pursuant to Resolution No. 39802 adopted June 20,1968 was quasi-judicial in nature, De Groot v. Sheffield, 95 So.2d 912 (Fla.1957); Bloomfield v. Mayo, 119 So.2d 417 (Fla. 1st DCA 1960), and culminated in an order rendered March 7, 1975; (2) under the then-applicable and governing provisions of Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 4.1 and 4.5c(l), the order was reviewable within sixty days from rendition; and (3) the ensuing challenge to that order commenced in the circuit court on February 25, 1976 by a complaint for declaratory relief, being more than eleven months after rendition of the administrative order, was untimely and, consequently, the circuit court lacked jurisdiction to entertain the proceeding. Central Truck Lines, Inc. v. Boyd, 106 So.2d 547 (Fla.1958).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The final judgment appealed from is affirmed on the basis that: (1) the underlying proceeding before the Retirement Board of the City of Miami seeking accidental disability pension pursuant to Resolution No. 39802 adopted June 20,1968 was quasi-judicial in nature, De Groot v. Sheffield, 95 So.2d 912 (Fla.1957); Bloomfield v. Mayo, 119 So.2d 417 (Fla. 1st DCA 1960), and culminated in an order rendered March 7, 1975; (2) under the then-applicable and governing provisions of Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 4.1 and 4.5c(l), the order was reviewable within sixty days from rendition; and (3) the ensuing challenge to that order commenced in the circuit court on February 25, 1976 by a complaint for declaratory relief, being more than eleven months after rendition of the administrative order, was untimely and, consequently, the circuit court lacked jurisdiction to entertain the proceeding. Central Truck Lines, Inc. v. Boyd, 106 So.2d 547 (Fla.1958).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

396 So. 2d 237, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19069, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hammond-v-city-of-miami-fladistctapp-1981.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack