Hammond v. City of Miami

396 So. 2d 237, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19069
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 31, 1981·No. No. 80-1289·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The final judgment appealed from is affirmed on the basis that: (1) the underlying proceeding before the Retirement Board of the City of Miami seeking accidental disability pension pursuant to Resolution No. 39802 adopted June 20,1968 was quasi-judicial in nature, De Groot v. Sheffield, 95 So.2d 912 (Fla.1957); Bloomfield v. Mayo, 119 So.2d 417 (Fla. 1st DCA 1960), and culminated in an order rendered March 7, 1975; (2) under the then-applicable and governing provisions of Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 4.1 and 4.5c(l), the order was reviewable within sixty days from rendition; and (3) the ensuing challenge to that order commenced in the circuit court on February 25, 1976 by a complaint for declaratory relief, being more than eleven months after rendition of the administrative order, was untimely and, consequently, the circuit court lacked jurisdiction to entertain the proceeding. Central Truck Lines, Inc. v. Boyd, 106 So.2d 547 (Fla.1958).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hammond v. City of Miami, 396 So. 2d 237, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19069 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

396 So. 2d 237 (Hammond v. City of Miami) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hampton v. Miami City Employees Retirement System
528 So. 2d 103 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)