Hammond v. Carnett's, Inc.
614 S.E.2d 114, 272 Ga. App. 851, 2005 Fulton County D. Rep. 1222, 2005 Ga. App. LEXIS 384, 2005 WL 851655
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hammond v. Carnett's, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 266 Ga. App. 242 →
Opinion
We previously held in this case that the trial court had abused its discretion in denying a motion for class certification.1 The Supreme Court has now reversed that decision, holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion.2 Accordingly, our previous decision is hereby vacated and the judgment of the Supreme Court is made the judgment of this court.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hammond v. Carnett's, Inc., 614 S.E.2d 114, 272 Ga. App. 851, 2005 Fulton County D. Rep. 1222, 2005 Ga. App. LEXIS 384, 2005 WL 851655 (Ga. Ct. App. 2005).
614 S.E.2d 114 (Hammond v. Carnett's, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Carnett's, Inc. v. Hammond
610 S.E.2d 529 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2005)
Hammond v. Carnett's, Inc.
596 S.E.2d 729 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2004)