Hammond v. Candler

22 Ga. 281
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMay 15, 1857
DocketNo. 1
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 22 Ga. 281 (Hammond v. Candler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hammond v. Candler, 22 Ga. 281 (Ga. 1857).

Opinion

By the Court.

McDonald, J.

delivering the opinion.

The record in this case, presents no intrinsic defect, which would of itself, render the judgment of the Court erroneous or reversible. It does not appear, but that the oath administered to the jury, was the oath prescribed by law. They were sworn, and the presumption of law is, that they were sworn legally. Tidd’s Prac. 918; 1. Sellon’s Pr. 498. The judgment cannot be arrested for intrinsic and foreign matter, not appearing on the face of the record. The Court below erred, therefore, in arresting the judgment for a cause not patent on the record, and his judgment must be reversed.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Berkeley v. State of Georgia
41 S.E.2d 265 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1947)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
22 Ga. 281, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hammond-v-candler-ga-1857.