Hammond v. Brown

Supreme Court

Hammond v. Brown

404 U.S. 962, 92 S. Ct. 330

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided November 19, 1971·No. No. A-507·Published

Opinion

C. A. 6th Cir. Application for stay presented to Mr. Justice Stewart, and by him referred to the Court, denied. Mr. Justice Douglas, believing that the Ohio anti-rioting statutes, Ohio Rev. Code Ann. §§ 2923.52 to 2923.54 (Supp. 1970), on their face seem overly broad and prima facie infringe on freedom of expression protected by the First Amendment, would grant stay for reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Younger v. Harris, 401 U. S. 37, 58.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

C. A. 6th Cir. Application for stay presented to Mr. Justice Stewart, and by him referred to the Court, denied. Mr. Justice Douglas, believing that the Ohio anti-rioting statutes, Ohio Rev. Code Ann. §§ 2923.52 to 2923.54 (Supp. 1970), on their face seem overly broad and prima facie infringe on freedom of expression protected by the First Amendment, would grant stay for reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Younger v. Harris, 401 U. S. 37, 58.

Hammond v. Brown, 404 U.S. 962, 92 S. Ct. 330 (1971).

Pincite

404 U.S. 962 (Hammond v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related