Home/Eleventh Circuit/Hammond v. Auburn University

Hammond v. Auburn University

860 F.2d 1092, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 19066, 1988 WL 105416
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hammond v. Auburn University. Read the opinion of the Court — 858 F.2d 744 →
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided September 30, 1988·No. 87-7638·Published

Opinion

860 F.2d 1092

Hammond (Ben)
v.
Auburn University, Martin (James E.), Emert (George H.),
Brandt (Dr. Warren W.), Irwin (Dr. David), Weaver (Dr.
Lynn), Bamburg (R.C.), Cunningham (Dr. Emory), Denson
(John), Holloway (Dr. Bessie Mae), Lowder (Robert E.),
McCartney (Michael), Nichols (Bill), Savage (Morris),
Steagall (Henry B., II), Tatum (James Jr.)

NO. 87-7638

United States Court of Appeals,
Eleventh Circuit.

SEP 30, 1988

Appeal From: M.D.Ala. 858 F.2d 744

DENIALS OF REHEARING EN BANC.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hammond v. Auburn University, 860 F.2d 1092, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 19066, 1988 WL 105416 (11th Cir. 1988).

860 F.2d 1092 (Hammond v. Auburn University) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.