Hammond Lumber Company v. Strolsee

California Court of Appeal

Hammond Lumber Company v. Strolsee

7 P.2d 727, 120 Cal. App. 766

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedJanuary 27, 1932

DocketDocket No. 621.

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 7 P.2d 727 (Hammond Lumber Company v. Strolsee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hammond Lumber Company v. Strolsee, 7 P.2d 727, 120 Cal. App. 766 (Cal. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

MEMORANDUM CASE. This action is a companion case to Hammond Lumber Co. v.Gilkey et al., Civil No. 620, in which the judgment of the trial court has been this day affirmed (ante, p. 252 [7 P.2d 724]). The appeal was brought by plaintiff and appellant Hammond Lumber Company from an order setting aside a judgment of foreclosure in a mechanic's lien case, which judgment had been entered after a default of the defendants against which the judgment was rendered had been duly entered by the clerk of the court. It was stipulated that the cases be heard on one reporter's transcript and one set of briefs.

[1] As the issues in both these cases are identical, upon the authority and for the reasons stated in the opinion in the case of Hammond Lumber Co. v. Gilkey et al., above referred to, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Barnard, P.J., and Marks, J., concurred.

A petition for a rehearing of this cause was denied by the District Court of Appeal on February 24, 1932.

*Page 1

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MEMORANDUM CASE. This action is a companion case to Hammond Lumber Co. v.Gilkey et al., Civil No. 620, in which the judgment of the trial court has been this day affirmed (ante, p. 252 [7 P.2d 724]). The appeal was brought by plaintiff and appellant Hammond Lumber Company from an order setting aside a judgment of foreclosure in a mechanic's lien case, which judgment had been entered after a default of the defendants against which the judgment was rendered had been duly entered by the clerk of the court. It was stipulated that the cases be heard on one reporter's transcript and one set of briefs.

[1] As the issues in both these cases are identical, upon the authority and for the reasons stated in the opinion in the case of Hammond Lumber Co. v. Gilkey et al., above referred to, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Barnard, P.J., and Marks, J., concurred.

A petition for a rehearing of this cause was denied by the District Court of Appeal on February 24, 1932.

*Page 1

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

7 P.2d 727, 120 Cal. App. 766, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hammond-lumber-company-v-strolsee-calctapp-1932.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack