Hammon v. Bayless

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Hammon v. Bayless

310 S.W.2d 267

CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky

DecidedFebruary 14, 1958

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 310 S.W.2d 267 (Hammon v. Bayless) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hammon v. Bayless, 310 S.W.2d 267 (Ky. Ct. App. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is a malicious prosecution case. We are affirming the judgment for $2,000 on a jury verdict because .we think the appellant •did not have probable cause for filing a complaint against the appellee with the State Board of Examiners and Registration of Architects. Nor do. we believe that he made full and fair disclosure of all the material facts to his attorneys before he filed the charges against Bayless.

The motion for an appeal is overruled, and the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is a malicious prosecution case. We are affirming the judgment for $2,000 on a jury verdict because .we think the appellant •did not have probable cause for filing a complaint against the appellee with the State Board of Examiners and Registration of Architects. Nor do. we believe that he made full and fair disclosure of all the material facts to his attorneys before he filed the charges against Bayless.

The motion for an appeal is overruled, and the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

310 S.W.2d 267, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hammon-v-bayless-kyctapp-1958.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack