HAMMOCKS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, INC. v. STATE OF FLORIDA

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 16, 2022
Docket21-1973
StatusPublished

This text of HAMMOCKS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, INC. v. STATE OF FLORIDA (HAMMOCKS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, INC. v. STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
HAMMOCKS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, INC. v. STATE OF FLORIDA, (Fla. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed March 16, 2022. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D21-1973 Lower Tribunal No. F21-13390 ________________

Hammocks Community Association, Inc., Petitioner,

vs.

State of Florida, Respondent.

On Petition for Writ of Certiorari from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Marlene Fernandez-Karavetsos, Judge.

Rasco Klock Perez & Nieto, and Hilton Napoleon, II, for petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Asad Ali, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Before EMAS, HENDON and BOKOR, JJ.

PER CURIAM. Because the petitioner, Hammocks Community Association, Inc., fails

to show irreparable harm, we dismiss the petition for lack of jurisdiction. See

Walgreen Co. v. Rubin, 229 So. 3d 418, 420-21 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017) (setting

forth elements of certiorari relief, including a departure from the essential

requirements of the law and a showing of irreparable harm); see also Topp

Telecom, Inc. v. Atkins, 763 So. 2d 1197, 1200 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) (“It

seems clear to us that the mere fact of unwarranted effort and expense is

not, by itself, synonymous with a ‘departure from the essential requirements

of law’ [e.s.] for which immediate review is necessary.”); Killinger v.

Guardianship of Grable, 983 So. 2d 30, 32 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008) (“While

certiorari may be used to review pre-trial orders compelling discovery, it is

generally not appropriate simply based on an argument that the discovery

request is overbroad, irrelevant, or burdensome.”).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Topp Telecom, Inc. v. Atkins
763 So. 2d 1197 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Walgreen Co. and Holiday Cvs, LLC v. Rubin
229 So. 3d 418 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)
Killinger v. Guardianship of Grable
983 So. 2d 30 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
HAMMOCKS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, INC. v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hammocks-community-association-inc-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2022.