Hammock v. Sumner Co.
This text of Hammock v. Sumner Co. (Hammock v. Sumner Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE MIDDLE SECTION AT NASHVILLE
FILED JERRY HAMMOCK and wife ) December 30, 1997 RUBY HAMMOCK, et al., ) Cecil W. Crowson ) Appellate Court Clerk Plaintiffs/Appellants, ) ) Sumner Circuit ) No. 15861-C VS. ) ) Appeal No. ) 01A01-9710-CV-00600 SUMNER COUNTY, TENNESSEE, ) ) Defendant/Appellee. )
OPINION DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING
Sumner County has filed a timely petition for rehearing in accordance with Tenn. R. App. P. 39 requesting this court to reconsider its December 5, 1997 opinion because it misapprehends the application of Tenn. R. Civ. P. 26.02(3) and 26.02(4). Citing Taylor v. Anderson-Tully Co., 151 F.R.D. 295, 296 (W.D. Tenn. 1993), the County asserts that the routine disclosure of an expert’s report prior to deposing the expert is “not a practice to be encouraged.” We respectfully disagree. Accordingly, the petition for rehearing is denied.
___________________________________ HENRY F. TODD, PRESIDING JUDGE MIDDLE SECTION
___________________________________ BEN H. CANTRELL, JUDGE
___________________________________ WILLIAM C. KOCH, JR., JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Hammock v. Sumner Co., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hammock-v-sumner-co-tennctapp-1997.