Hammock v. Jensen

549 F. App'x 600
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided January 9, 2014·No. No. 13-2165·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Calvin Hammock brought an action under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985 and Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act arising out of his detention and arrest and criminal charges brought against him that were later dismissed. Upon defendants’ various motions, the District Court1 dismissed some defendants and claims under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (failure to state a claim) and the remainder under Rule 56 (summary judgment). Upon de novo review, see Bernini v. City of St. Paul, 665 F.3d 997, 1002-03 (8th Cir.) (Rule 56), cert, denied, — U.S. -, 133 S.Ct. 526, 184 L.Ed.2d 338 (2012); Brooks v. Midwest Heart Grp., 655 F.3d 796, 799 (8th Cir.2011) (Rule 12(b)(6)), and careful consideration of Hammock’s arguments for reversal, we affirm for the reasons stated by the District Court.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hammock v. Jensen, 549 F. App'x 600 (8th Cir. 2014).

549 F. App'x 600 (Hammock v. Jensen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brooks v. Midwest Heart Group
655 F.3d 796 (Eighth Circuit, 2011)
Brook Bernini v. City of St. Paul
665 F.3d 997 (Eighth Circuit, 2012)