Hammock v. Collins

113 S.E. 112, 28 Ga. App. 769, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 848
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJuly 12, 1922
Docket13573
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 113 S.E. 112 (Hammock v. Collins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hammock v. Collins, 113 S.E. 112, 28 Ga. App. 769, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 848 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

Opinion

Luke, J.

The evidence in this ease wholly fails to show the conversion of the specific property sued for, and furthermore under the evidence the case falls within the rule announced in Spikes v. Sassnett, 19 Ga. App. 479 (91 S. E. 789), and' case cited. It was error for the court to overrule the defendants’ motion for a new trial.

Judgment reversed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur. H. C. Beasley, for plaintiff in error. E. C. Collins, H. H. Elders, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Graham v. Raines
64 S.E.2d 98 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1951)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
113 S.E. 112, 28 Ga. App. 769, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 848, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hammock-v-collins-gactapp-1922.