Hammock v. Collins

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Hammock v. Collins

113 S.E. 112, 28 Ga. App. 769, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 848

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided July 12, 1922·No. 13573·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Luke, J.

The evidence in this ease wholly fails to show the conversion of the specific property sued for, and furthermore under the evidence the case falls within the rule announced in Spikes v. Sassnett, 19 Ga. App. 479 (91 S. E. 789), and' case cited. It was error for the court to overrule the defendants’ motion for a new trial.

Judgment reversed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur. H. C. Beasley, for plaintiff in error. E. C. Collins, H. H. Elders, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luke, J.

The evidence in this ease wholly fails to show the conversion of the specific property sued for, and furthermore under the evidence the case falls within the rule announced in Spikes v. Sassnett, 19 Ga. App. 479 (91 S. E. 789), and' case cited. It was error for the court to overrule the defendants’ motion for a new trial.

Judgment reversed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur. H. C. Beasley, for plaintiff in error. E. C. Collins, H. H. Elders, contra.

Hammock v. Collins, 113 S.E. 112, 28 Ga. App. 769, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 848 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

Pincite

113 S.E. 112 (Hammock v. Collins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related