Hammill v. Pennsylvania Railroad

96 A. 292, 88 N.J.L. 717, 1916 N.J. LEXIS 250
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedMarch 6, 1916
StatusPublished

This text of 96 A. 292 (Hammill v. Pennsylvania Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hammill v. Pennsylvania Railroad, 96 A. 292, 88 N.J.L. 717, 1916 N.J. LEXIS 250 (N.J. 1916).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Parker in the Supreme Court.

For .affirmance—The Chiee Justice, Garrison, Trenchard, Bergen, Mintuen, Black, White, Terhune, TTeppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, JJ. 11.

For rev ersa l—1ST one.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
96 A. 292, 88 N.J.L. 717, 1916 N.J. LEXIS 250, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hammill-v-pennsylvania-railroad-nj-1916.