Hammett v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Hammett v. State

1929 OK CR 461, 281 P. 1117, 46 Okla. Crim. 110, 1929 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 425

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedOctober 26, 1929

DocketNo. A-7160.

StatusPublished

This text of 1929 OK CR 461 (Hammett v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hammett v. State, 1929 OK CR 461, 281 P. 1117, 46 Okla. Crim. 110, 1929 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 425 (Okla. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error was convicted in the county court of Pontotoc county on a charge of *111 having the unlawful possession of whisky, and was sentenced to pay a fine of $50 and to< serve 30 days in the county jail.

Judgment was rendered' in May, 1928, and the appeal was lodged in this court in September, 1928. No briefs in support of the appeal have been filed. The evidence sustains the judgment. No material error is apparent.

The case is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error was convicted in the county court of Pontotoc county on a charge of *111 having the unlawful possession of whisky, and was sentenced to pay a fine of $50 and to< serve 30 days in the county jail.

Judgment was rendered' in May, 1928, and the appeal was lodged in this court in September, 1928. No briefs in support of the appeal have been filed. The evidence sustains the judgment. No material error is apparent.

The case is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1929 OK CR 461, 281 P. 1117, 46 Okla. Crim. 110, 1929 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 425, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hammett-v-state-oklacrimapp-1929.