Hammett v. State
110 S.E. 624, 27 Ga. App. 624, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 316
Opinion
There is no merit in the errors assigned upon the several excerpts from the charge of the court. If the defendant wished more particular instructions, timely request should have been made. The evidence authorized the conviction, and it was not error to overrule the motion for a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hammett v. State, 110 S.E. 624, 27 Ga. App. 624, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 316 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).
110 S.E. 624 (Hammett v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Todd v. State
189 S.E.2d 696 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1972)
Tucker v. State
95 S.E.2d 296 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1956)
Rome Railway & Light Co. v. King
126 S.E. 294 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1925)