Hammett v. Farrar

29 S.W.2d 949
CourtTexas Commission of Appeals
DecidedJune 25, 1930
DocketNo. 1238—5272
StatusPublished
Cited by22 cases

This text of 29 S.W.2d 949 (Hammett v. Farrar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Commission of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hammett v. Farrar, 29 S.W.2d 949 (Tex. Super. Ct. 1930).

Opinion

CRITZ, J.

This suit was brought in the Forty-First district court of El Paso county, Tex., by Benjamin De Forest B. Hammett, hereafter called plaintiff, against Mrs. Guy Hammett Farrar and husband, and others. Mrs. Far-rar died before the trial, and her devisees and legal representatives were made parties defendant. The suit was in trespass to try tifie and to recover an undivided one-half interest in certain real property in El Paso county, Tex. There was a judgment in the trial court based on an instructed verdict for the defendants. Plaintiff duly appealed from this judgment to the Court of Civil Appeals for the Eighth District at El Paso, which court in all things affirmed the judgment of the trial court, but corrected said judgment on a matter immaterial to any discussion here. 8 S.W.(2d) 236. The case is now before this court on writ of error granted on application of plaintiff.

The plaintiff’s cause of action is based primarily on the following contract dated [950]*950November 27, 1923, between plaintiff on the one band, and Mrs. Guy Hammett Farrar and husband on the other:

“This agreement entered into between Mrs. Guy Hammett Farrar, joined proforma herein by her husband, B. L. Farrar, of the first part and Benjamin De Forest Buel Hammett of the second part, all of El Paso County, Texas, witnesseth: '
“That whereas the said Guy Hammett Far-rar is the daughter of Mary S. P. Hammett and the said Benjamin De Forest Hammett is the grandson of the said Mary S. P. Hammett and is a nephew of Guy Hammett Far-rar and both of said parties are legal and lawful heirs of the said Mary S. P. Hammett and have reason to believe that upon the death of the said Mary S. P. Hammett they will be named as legatees in the will of the said Mary S. P. Hammett and for the purpose of eliminating any unnecessary feeling or inequities that either may feel might arise, with reference to the legacies first above mentioned, it is herewith agreed between the said parties: That all property, other than family keepsakes or mementoes, inherited under the said will by the said Guy Hammett Farrar and all property, other than family keepsakes or mementoes, inherited under the will by the said Benjamin De Forest Buel Hammett, shall be joined together and divided equally, one-half thereof to the said Guy ITammett Farrar and the other one-half to the said Benjamin De Forest Buel Hammett.
“It being the intention of the parties hereto to divide equally all interests of a monetary nature inherited by either or both from the said estate of Mrs. Mary S. P. Hammett, so that each of the said parties shall enjoy an equal part of the said estate as inherited by both.
“The said Benjamin De Forest Buel Hammett is also known as Ben Hammett and as Buel Hammett, and is designated in either of the three ways by acquaintances, relatives, friends and associates.
“These presents are drawn as an assurance to Guy Hammett Farrar that she will profit equally in her mother’s estate with her nephew Benjamin De Forest Buel Hammett and is drawn for the purpose of assuring the said Benjamin De Forest Buel Hammett that he will profit equally with his aunt, the said Guy Hammett Farrar in the distribution of his grandmother’s estate.”

This contract was executed and acknowledged by all parties in due form of law.

At the time the above contract was entered into Mrs. Mary S. P. Plammett had already made a will in due form of law, which will was dated November 29, 1921. We 'do not know whether the parties to the contract knew the contents of this will when the contract was made. Said will is as follows:

“State of Texas, County of El Paso.
“In the name of God, Amen: I, Mary S. P, Hammett, of El Paso, El Paso County, Texas, which said City of El Paso is my home and residence, being of good health and of sound and disposing mind and memory, and mindful of the uncertainty of life, and the certainty of - death, do make and publish this, my Last Will and testament, hereby expressly revoking all previous wills, testaments, and codicils heretofore by me at any time made.
“Section One: I make, constitute and appoint my daughter, Mrs. Guy Hammett Far-rar and her husband B. L. Farrar, independent joint executors of this, my Will, and of my estate and in the event that in any case they may not agree as to what should be done, I direct that Jos. U. Sweeney, shall decide the question at issue between them and if requested by either of them, he shall render his decision in writing. If under the law my said executors are required to evidence any contract, conveyance, lien or other thing in relation to my estate by an instrument in writing, and there should be a difference of opinion between my said executors as to the advisability of such contract, conveyance, lien or other thing, the said Jos. U. Sweeney shall manifest his decision by joining as such arbiter in the execution of such contract, conveyance, lien or other thing. In the event of the death, refusal to accept such executorship, disqualification, resignation or removal of any one of my said executors, then I make, constitute and appoint the said Jos. U. Sweeney, substitute executor to fill the vacancy thereby occasioned and he shall have all the rights, powers, duties and obligations of the executor whose place he has taken and the power here-inabove vested in him as arbiter shall terminate.
“Section Two: I direct that no bond or other security shall be required of my said executors or either of them, or of the said' Jos. U. Sweeney, either as arbiter or as substitute executor and I direct that no other action shall be had in the County court in relation to the settlement of my estate, than the probating and recording of my will, and the return of an inventory, appraisement and list of claims of my estate,-and as far as I lawfully can, I exempt the executors under this will from the control, supervision and jurisdiction of all Probate courts. If from-any cause the number of executors hereunder should be reduced to one only that one shall have and exercise and discharge all the-rights, powers, duties and obligations by this-instrument vested in two executors.
“Section Three. My said executors shall-have the power to sell and convey, assign and transfer any land, properties, things or asset of my estate not herein specifically devised or-bequeathed, upon such terms and conditions-as they deem best and the purchaser or pur[951]*951chasers need not see to the application of the purchase money, but this power shall be exercised only for the purpose of enabling them more effectually to pay the debts of my estate which are not secured by a deed of trust, mortgage or express contract lien, the legacies hereinafter made, settle my estate, and exercise the rights, powers, and duties of this "Will conferred on them and any conveyance, transfer or assignment of such land, properties, things or asset made by my said executors and purporting to have been made by virtue hereof shall be presumed in favor of any person claiming thereunder to have been made in accordance with the powers in said executors vested by virtue hereof.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Osherow v. Porras (In Re Porras)
312 B.R. 81 (W.D. Texas, 2004)
Estate of McWhorter v. Wooten
622 S.W.2d 844 (Texas Supreme Court, 1981)
Terrell v. Graham
569 S.W.2d 595 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1978)
Irvin v. Smith
497 S.W.2d 796 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1973)
Birk v. First Wichita National Bank of Wichita Falls
352 S.W.2d 781 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1961)
Rivers v. Rivers
346 S.W.2d 376 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1961)
McCauley v. Simmer
336 S.W.2d 872 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1960)
Hemingway Estate
151 A.2d 472 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1959)
F. E. McGillick Co. v. Commissioner
30 T.C. 1130 (U.S. Tax Court, 1958)
Sanders v. Maxwell
265 S.W.2d 683 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1954)
Young v. Rudd
226 S.W.2d 469 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1950)
Burges v. Gray
211 S.W.2d 776 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1948)
Anderson v. Telsrow
21 N.W.2d 781 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1946)
Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Luckel
171 S.W.2d 902 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1943)
Holley v. Mucher
165 S.W.2d 1015 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1942)
Langehennig v. Hohmann
163 S.W.2d 402 (Texas Supreme Court, 1942)
Hohmann v. Langehennig
153 S.W.2d 1011 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1941)
Cohen Testamentary Trust v. Commissioner
42 B.T.A. 1074 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1940)
Patton v. Cumbie
74 S.W.2d 134 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1934)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
29 S.W.2d 949, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hammett-v-farrar-texcommnapp-1930.