Hammersley v. Superior Court

65 P.2d 359, 19 Cal. App. 2d 356, 1937 Cal. App. LEXIS 433
California Court of Appeal·Decided February 26, 1937·No. Civ. No. 10481·Published

Opinion

THE COURT.

Petition for prohibition. The lower court has jurisdiction to determine the question involved. Prohibition therefore will not lie. (Bullard v. Bullard, 189 Cal. 502, 506 [209 Pac. 361]; Kelsey v. Miller, 203 Cal. 61, 88 [263 Pac. 200].)

Writ denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hammersley v. Superior Court, 65 P.2d 359, 19 Cal. App. 2d 356, 1937 Cal. App. LEXIS 433 (Cal. Ct. App. 1937).

65 P.2d 359 (Hammersley v. Superior Court) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kelsey v. Miller
263 P. 200 (California Supreme Court, 1928)
Bullard v. Bullard
209 P. 361 (California Supreme Court, 1922)