Hammersley v. Superior Court
65 P.2d 359, 19 Cal. App. 2d 356, 1937 Cal. App. LEXIS 433
This text of 65 P.2d 359 (Hammersley v. Superior Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hammersley v. Superior Court, 65 P.2d 359, 19 Cal. App. 2d 356, 1937 Cal. App. LEXIS 433 (Cal. Ct. App. 1937).
Opinion
Petition for prohibition. The lower court has jurisdiction to determine the question involved. Prohibition therefore will not lie. (Bullard v. Bullard, 189 Cal. 502, 506 [209 Pac. 361]; Kelsey v. Miller, 203 Cal. 61, 88 [263 Pac. 200].)
Writ denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Kelsey v. Miller
263 P. 200 (California Supreme Court, 1928)
Bullard v. Bullard
209 P. 361 (California Supreme Court, 1922)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
65 P.2d 359, 19 Cal. App. 2d 356, 1937 Cal. App. LEXIS 433, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hammersley-v-superior-court-calctapp-1937.