Hammerschlag Manuf'g Co. v. Spalding
This text of 35 F. 66 (Hammerschlag Manuf'g Co. v. Spalding) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In view of the broad construction given to the fifth claim of the Hammerschlag patent by various courts, and especially in view of [67]*67the decision of Judge Lowell in the Wood Case, 18 Fed. Rep. 175. Iain clearly of opinion that the complainant is entitled to a preliminary injunction. The Spaulding machine manifestly comes within the scope of these decisions. Differences of such a class as exist between the Spaulding and Hammerschlag machines have been held not to relieve a party from the charge of infringement. Injunction granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
35 F. 66, 1886 U.S. App. LEXIS 2415, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hammerschlag-manufg-co-v-spalding-circtdma-1886.