Hammerschlag Manuf'g Co. v. Judd
This text of 26 F. 292 (Hammerschlag Manuf'g Co. v. Judd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
When either party, on motion for a preliminary injunction, desires to take the testimony of an unwilling witness, application should be made to the court, and notice given to the other side. The motion should be in writing, and should set forth the name or names of the witnesses, and briefly the purpose for which they are to be called. The court should then, if the application is a proper one, appoint an examiner to take such testimony, due notice to be given to the other side, who should have the right of cross-examination. The defendant’s motion for subpoena, in its present form, and also his motion for attachment, must be denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
26 F. 292, 1886 U.S. App. LEXIS 1942, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hammerschlag-manufg-co-v-judd-circtdma-1886.