Hammerman v. Arlington Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n
This text of 385 F.2d 835 (Hammerman v. Arlington Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
While we think the District Court had jurisdiction to inquire into the matter, particularly to determine the bona fides of the partnership in which the bankrupt was a limited partner, we agree, for the reasons stated in the opinion of the District Court, filed on July 6, 1967,1 that the bankrupt’s interest as a limited partner gave the bankruptcy court no power to administer real estate owned by the partnership or to enjoin its sale under foreclosure by the mortgagee.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
385 F.2d 835, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hammerman-v-arlington-federal-savings-loan-assn-ca4-1967.