Hammerman v. Arlington Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n
385 F.2d 835
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 10, 1967·No. No. 11663·Published·Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
While we think the District Court had jurisdiction to inquire into the matter, particularly to determine the bona fides of the partnership in which the bankrupt was a limited partner, we agree, for the reasons stated in the opinion of the District Court, filed on July 6, 1967,1 that the bankrupt’s interest as a limited partner gave the bankruptcy court no power to administer real estate owned by the partnership or to enjoin its sale under foreclosure by the mortgagee.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hammerman v. Arlington Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n, 385 F.2d 835 (4th Cir. 1967).
385 F.2d 835 (Hammerman v. Arlington Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sheppard v. Bay Country Realty, Inc.
465 A.2d 857 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1983)
Klein v. Weiss
395 A.2d 126 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1978)
Hawaiian Investors v. Thorndal
417 F.2d 929 (Eighth Circuit, 1969)
Hammerman, II v. Arlington Federal Savings & Loan Association
385 F.2d 835 (Fourth Circuit, 1967)