Hammeren v. Hammeren
Opinion
Filed 10/23/12 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2012 ND 210
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Jose Angel Anaya-Verajerano, Defendant and Appellant
No. 20120268
Appeal from the District Court of Bowman County, Southwest Judicial District, the Honorable Harlan Patrick Weir, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
James D. Gion, State’s Attorney, P.O. Box 101, Regent, N.D. 58650-0101, for plaintiff and appellee; on brief.
Jay R. Greenwood, 135 Sims, Suite 221, Dickinson, N.D. 58601, for defendant and appellant; on brief.
State v. Anaya-Verajerano
[¶1] Jose Anaya-Verajerano appealed from a criminal judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of conspiracy to commit burglary and conspiracy to commit theft. Anaya-Verajerano contends there was insufficient evidence for the jury to find that there was a conspiracy to commit burglary or theft. We affirm the judgment under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Mary Muehlen Maring
Daniel J. Crothers
Dale V. Sandstrom
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
2012 ND 225 (Hammeren v. Hammeren) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.