Hammer v. Uber Technologies, Inc.

District of Columbia

Hammer v. Uber Technologies, Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia·Decided January 14, 2025·No. Civil Action No. 2023-2763·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

BENJAMIN L. HAMMER, Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 23-cv-2763-MJS UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., Defendants.

ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO STAY This matter is before the Court on a Joint Motion for Stay of Proceedings (ECF No. 35).

This case has been deemed related to another declaratory judgment action, USAA Casualty Insurance Co. v. Truck Insurance Exchange, et al., No. 24-cv-3237-MJS. The parties represent that although they attempted to mediate this case in November 2024, they now anticipate being unable to resolve this matter until the related declaratory judgment action is resolved.

On review, the Court GRANTS the joint motion and STAYS this action in its entirety to allow the related case to move forward. Given the stay, the Court VACATES the status hearing that had previously been scheduled for January 16, 2024. Further, per the parties’ agreement, this Order STAYS any potential assessment of pre-judgment interest as of January 13, 2025. While the case remains stayed, the parties are ORDERED to file a joint status report no later than ninety (90) days from the date of this Order, and again every ninety (90) days thereafter.

SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 14, 2024 MATTHEW J. SHARBAUGH

United States Magistrate Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

BENJAMIN L. HAMMER, Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 23-cv-2763-MJS UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., Defendants.

ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO STAY This matter is before the Court on a Joint Motion for Stay of Proceedings (ECF No. 35).

This case has been deemed related to another declaratory judgment action, USAA Casualty Insurance Co. v. Truck Insurance Exchange, et al., No. 24-cv-3237-MJS. The parties represent that although they attempted to mediate this case in November 2024, they now anticipate being unable to resolve this matter until the related declaratory judgment action is resolved.

On review, the Court GRANTS the joint motion and STAYS this action in its entirety to allow the related case to move forward. Given the stay, the Court VACATES the status hearing that had previously been scheduled for January 16, 2024. Further, per the parties’ agreement, this Order STAYS any potential assessment of pre-judgment interest as of January 13, 2025. While the case remains stayed, the parties are ORDERED to file a joint status report no later than ninety (90) days from the date of this Order, and again every ninety (90) days thereafter.

SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 14, 2024 MATTHEW J. SHARBAUGH

United States Magistrate Judge

Hammer v. Uber Technologies, Inc., (D.D.C. 2025).

Pincite

Hammer v. Uber Technologies, Inc. (Hammer v. Uber Technologies, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.