Hammer v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
This text of Hammer v. Uber Technologies, Inc. (Hammer v. Uber Technologies, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
BENJAMIN L. HAMMER,
Plaintiff,
v. Case No. 23-cv-2763-MJS
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO STAY
This matter is before the Court on a Joint Motion for Stay of Proceedings (ECF No. 35).
This case has been deemed related to another declaratory judgment action, USAA Casualty
Insurance Co. v. Truck Insurance Exchange, et al., No. 24-cv-3237-MJS. The parties represent
that although they attempted to mediate this case in November 2024, they now anticipate being
unable to resolve this matter until the related declaratory judgment action is resolved.
On review, the Court GRANTS the joint motion and STAYS this action in its entirety to
allow the related case to move forward. Given the stay, the Court VACATES the status hearing
that had previously been scheduled for January 16, 2024. Further, per the parties’ agreement, this
Order STAYS any potential assessment of pre-judgment interest as of January 13, 2025. While the
case remains stayed, the parties are ORDERED to file a joint status report no later than ninety
(90) days from the date of this Order, and again every ninety (90) days thereafter.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 14, 2024 MATTHEW J. SHARBAUGH United States Magistrate Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Hammer v. Uber Technologies, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hammer-v-uber-technologies-inc-dcd-2025.