Hammer v. Michael
155 N.E. 895, 244 N.Y. 556, 1927 N.Y. LEXIS 1086
This text of 155 N.E. 895 (Hammer v. Michael) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hammer v. Michael, 155 N.E. 895, 244 N.Y. 556, 1927 N.Y. LEXIS 1086 (N.Y. 1927).
Opinion
Motion to amend remittitur. (See 243 N. Y. 445.)
Motion granted, without costs. Return of remittitur requested and when returned the same will be amended by adding a provision that defendant have judgment against plaintiff for the return of his deposit of one thousand dollars, with interest from date of payment thereof.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Hammer v. Michael
154 N.E. 305 (New York Court of Appeals, 1926)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
155 N.E. 895, 244 N.Y. 556, 1927 N.Y. LEXIS 1086, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hammer-v-michael-ny-1927.