Hammer v. Michael

155 N.E. 895, 244 N.Y. 556, 1927 N.Y. LEXIS 1086
New York Court of Appeals·Decided January 18, 1927·Published

Opinion

Motion to amend remittitur. (See 243 N. Y. 445.)

Motion granted, without costs. Return of remittitur requested and when returned the same will be amended by adding a provision that defendant have judgment against plaintiff for the return of his deposit of one thousand dollars, with interest from date of payment thereof.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hammer v. Michael, 155 N.E. 895, 244 N.Y. 556, 1927 N.Y. LEXIS 1086 (N.Y. 1927).

155 N.E. 895 (Hammer v. Michael) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hammer v. Michael
154 N.E. 305 (New York Court of Appeals, 1926)