Hammer v. Hammer

9 A.D.2d 652, 194 N.Y.S.2d 884, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6746

Opinion

Motion granted insofar as to allow the appeals to be heard in one appeal book, without duplication of printing, and on condition that the said appeals be argued or submitted at the same time. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, M. M. Frank, Valente and Stevens, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hammer v. Hammer, 9 A.D.2d 652, 194 N.Y.S.2d 884, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6746 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

9 A.D.2d 652 (Hammer v. Hammer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.