Hammer v. Dahl
This text of 243 A.D. 571 (Hammer v. Dahl) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by defendants, appellants, from order striking out certain allegations of the complaint in so far as such order denied defendants’ motion to strike out other parts of the complaint, dismissed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, on the authority of Millard v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western R. R. Co. (204 App. Div. 80). If defendants have not served an answer to the second amended complaint, their time so to [572]*572do is extended ten days from the service of a copy of the order to be entered, with notice of entry thereof. Motion No. 1474 to dismiss appeal granted. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Seudder,- Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
243 A.D. 571, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hammer-v-dahl-nyappdiv-1934.