Hammer v. Barnes

26 How. Pr. 174
New York Supreme Court·Decided November 15, 1863·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Mullin, Justice,

rendered judgment in favor of the plaintiff, overruling the demurrer, with costs ; holding it as his opinion, that in such cases the jurisdiction of the Court was established by numerous decisions, and he should not now dispute it; that in his opinion, if the plaintiff was entitled to any final relief by injunction or otherwise against Charles N. Barnes, he was properly made a party defendant.

[177]*177That the complaint showed that the plaintiff’s partners had no interest in the controversy, and the parties who were supposed to have acquired the secret from the defendants were not necessarily parties.

Judgment in favor of the plaintiff, overruling the demurrer, with costs, with liberty to answer in twenty days.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hammer v. Barnes, 26 How. Pr. 174 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1863).

26 How. Pr. 174 (Hammer v. Barnes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Westcott Chuck Co. v. Oneida National Chuck Co.
122 A.D. 260 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1907)
O. & W. Thum Co. v. Tloczynski
38 L.R.A. 200 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1897)
Little v. Gallus
4 A.D. 569 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1896)
Eastman Co. v. Reichenbach
20 N.Y.S. 110 (New York Supreme Court, 1892)
Tabor v. . Hoffman
23 N.E. 12 (New York Court of Appeals, 1889)
Wertheim v. Continental Ry. & Trust Co.
15 F. 716 (S.D. New York, 1883)