Hammer v. Barnes
This text of 26 How. Pr. 174 (Hammer v. Barnes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
rendered judgment in favor of the plaintiff, overruling the demurrer, with costs ; holding it as his opinion, that in such cases the jurisdiction of the Court was established by numerous decisions, and he should not now dispute it; that in his opinion, if the plaintiff was entitled to any final relief by injunction or otherwise against Charles N. Barnes, he was properly made a party defendant.
[177]*177That the complaint showed that the plaintiff’s partners had no interest in the controversy, and the parties who were supposed to have acquired the secret from the defendants were not necessarily parties.
Judgment in favor of the plaintiff, overruling the demurrer, with costs, with liberty to answer in twenty days.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
26 How. Pr. 174, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hammer-v-barnes-nysupct-1863.