Hammelman v. State

907 So. 2d 577, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 10949, 2005 WL 1653777
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 14, 2005
DocketNo. 1D05-2044
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 907 So. 2d 577 (Hammelman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hammelman v. State, 907 So. 2d 577, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 10949, 2005 WL 1653777 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits.

BROWNING, POLSTON and HAWKES, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matlack v. Day
907 So. 2d 577 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
907 So. 2d 577, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 10949, 2005 WL 1653777, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hammelman-v-state-fladistctapp-2005.