Hammelman v. State

907 So. 2d 577, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 10949, 2005 WL 1653777
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 14, 2005·No. No. 1D05-2044·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits.

BROWNING, POLSTON and HAWKES, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hammelman v. State, 907 So. 2d 577, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 10949, 2005 WL 1653777 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

907 So. 2d 577 (Hammelman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matlack v. Day
907 So. 2d 577 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)