Hammell v. Tad Properties, L.L.C.
This text of 886 So. 2d 433 (Hammell v. Tad Properties, L.L.C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant appeals an award of attorneys’ fees and costs based on a proposal for settlement made by appellees pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.442, and sections 45.061 and 768.79, Florida Statutes. We must reverse because the proposal for settlement was invalid as it failed to state the amount and terms attributable to each defendant as required by rule 1.442(c)(3). See Hilyer Sod, Inc. v. Willis Shaw Express, Inc., 817 So.2d 1050 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002), approved, 849 So.2d 276 (Fla.2003).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
886 So. 2d 433, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 17318, 2004 WL 2600431, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hammell-v-tad-properties-llc-fladistctapp-2004.