Hammell v. Tad Properties, L.L.C.
886 So. 2d 433, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 17318, 2004 WL 2600431
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 17, 2004·No. No. 1D03-4873·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Appellant appeals an award of attorneys’ fees and costs based on a proposal for settlement made by appellees pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.442, and sections 45.061 and 768.79, Florida Statutes. We must reverse because the proposal for settlement was invalid as it failed to state the amount and terms attributable to each defendant as required by rule 1.442(c)(3). See Hilyer Sod, Inc. v. Willis Shaw Express, Inc., 817 So.2d 1050 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002), approved, 849 So.2d 276 (Fla.2003).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hammell v. Tad Properties, L.L.C., 886 So. 2d 433, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 17318, 2004 WL 2600431 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).
886 So. 2d 433 (Hammell v. Tad Properties, L.L.C.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Tubwell v. State
886 So. 2d 433 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)