Hammel v. Atkinson

82 Miss. 465
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 15, 1903
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 82 Miss. 465 (Hammel v. Atkinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hammel v. Atkinson, 82 Miss. 465 (Mich. 1903).

Opinion

Price, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This was an action of unlawful entry and detainer, under chapter 142 of the Code of 1892. Hammel had rented his place [468]*468to Olarty, and Olarty. was in possession of the land, making a crop. Mrs. Atkinson took possession of forty acres of this land, cleared up a small portion of it, and erected a house thereon. The only question presented by the record is, could the landlord bring this action against a third party while his tenant held possession of the land ? The lower court held that he could not; that the tenant who held the possession under contract with Hammel should bring the suit. In this view we concur. At least the tenant in possession, before the expiration of his term, is a necessary party. 13 Am. & Eng. Enc. Law (2d ed.), 752.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ward v. Hudson
24 So. 2d 329 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1946)
Walton v. Wall
70 So. 549 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1915)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
82 Miss. 465, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hammel-v-atkinson-miss-1903.