Hammel Station Estates, Inc. v. Long Island Rail Road

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hammel Station Estates, Inc. v. Long Island Rail Road

259 A.D. 1085, 22 N.Y.S.2d 198, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8099

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 2, 1940

StatusPublished

This text of 259 A.D. 1085 (Hammel Station Estates, Inc. v. Long Island Rail Road) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hammel Station Estates, Inc. v. Long Island Rail Road, 259 A.D. 1085, 22 N.Y.S.2d 198, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8099 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

Action for a declaratory judgment. Orders granting respective motions of respondents The Long Island Rail Road Company, The Transit Commission of the State of New York, and The City of New York, to dismiss the complaint pursuant to rule 106, Rules of Civil Practice, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to each respondent. Order granting motion of respondent State of New York to dismiss the complaint pursuant to rule 106, Rules of Civil Practice, and judgment entered thereon, unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action for a declaratory judgment. Orders granting respective motions of respondents The Long Island Rail Road Company, The Transit Commission of the State of New York, and The City of New York, to dismiss the complaint pursuant to rule 106, Rules of Civil Practice, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to each respondent. Order granting motion of respondent State of New York to dismiss the complaint pursuant to rule 106, Rules of Civil Practice, and judgment entered thereon, unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

259 A.D. 1085, 22 N.Y.S.2d 198, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8099, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hammel-station-estates-inc-v-long-island-rail-road-nyappdiv-1940.