Hammatt v. Bassett
This text of 19 Mass. 564 (Hammatt v. Bassett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
said the Court were of opinion that the evidence was rightly rejected as irrelevant. The land attached was probably different from that mentioned in the agreement, but this is immaterial; for the parties to the agreement c.on[601]*601dered that nothing in it was to be obligatory, until the appraisement should be made, and if they should not agree to the appraisement, the party disagreeing was to pay the costs. We see nothing fraudulent in the plaintiff’s making the attachment.
Judgment according to the verdict.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
19 Mass. 564, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hammatt-v-bassett-mass-1824.