Home/The Superior Court of New York City/Hammann v. Jordan

Hammann v. Jordan

27 Jones & S. 95, 36 N.Y. St. Rep. 434
The Superior Court of New York City·Decided February 13, 1891·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff not having succeeded in the action, which was for a money demand, is not entitled to an additional allowance. Nor was there any judgment in his favor on the counter-claim. §§ 3228, 3234, Code Civil Procedure.

The part of the judgment appealed from by defendant is reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hammann v. Jordan, 27 Jones & S. 95, 36 N.Y. St. Rep. 434 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1891).

27 Jones & S. 95 (Hammann v. Jordan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.