Hammack v. State

601 So. 2d 308, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 7270, 1992 WL 138797
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 24, 1992·No. No. 91-2212·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Reversed and remanded for a new trial on the authority of Turner v. State, 376 So.2d 429 (Fla. 1st DCA1979) and Lawson v. State, 251 So.2d 683 (Fla. 3d DCA1971). We also agree with appellant that it was error for the trial court to first suggest, and thereafter, permit, the state’s police witnesses to wear shirts with the word “POLICE” printed thereon, after granting a motion to suppress the state’s use of such a shirt as evidence.

ANSTEAD, WARNER and FARMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hammack v. State, 601 So. 2d 308, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 7270, 1992 WL 138797 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

601 So. 2d 308 (Hammack v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lawson v. State
251 So. 2d 683 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1971)
Turner v. State
376 So. 2d 429 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)