Hamm v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Hamm v. State

404 S.W.3d 406, 2013 WL 3807895, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 867

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided July 23, 2013·No. No. WD 75489·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Mr. Bobby Hamm, Jr. appeals the trial court’s judgment denying a Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. He alleges ineffective assistance of counsel because plea counsel assured him that by entering an open plea to the charge of first-degree statutory rape, he would receive no more than a fifteen-year sentence.

For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Mr. Bobby Hamm, Jr. appeals the trial court’s judgment denying a Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. He alleges ineffective assistance of counsel because plea counsel assured him that by entering an open plea to the charge of first-degree statutory rape, he would receive no more than a fifteen-year sentence.

For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Hamm v. State, 404 S.W.3d 406, 2013 WL 3807895, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 867 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

404 S.W.3d 406 (Hamm v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.