Hamm v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Hamm v. State

247 S.E.2d 211, 146 Ga. App. 628, 1978 Ga. App. LEXIS 2486

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJuly 10, 1978

Docket56077

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 247 S.E.2d 211 (Hamm v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hamm v. State, 247 S.E.2d 211, 146 Ga. App. 628, 1978 Ga. App. LEXIS 2486 (Ga. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

Birdsong, Judge.

Hamm was convicted of armed robbery. His sole contention on appeal is that a statement signed by him was not voluntarily given because he was using drugs at the time the statement was made. On virtually identical facts, this same contention was decided adversely to appellant in Richardson v. State, 143 Ga. App. 846 (240 SE2d 217). See Little v. State, 142 Ga. App. 343 (235 SE2d 764). The trial court did not err in admitting into evidence appellant’s statement.

Judgment affirmed.

Bell, C. J., and Shulman, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Birdsong, Judge.

Hamm was convicted of armed robbery. His sole contention on appeal is that a statement signed by him was not voluntarily given because he was using drugs at the time the statement was made. On virtually identical facts, this same contention was decided adversely to appellant in Richardson v. State, 143 Ga. App. 846 (240 SE2d 217). See Little v. State, 142 Ga. App. 343 (235 SE2d 764). The trial court did not err in admitting into evidence appellant’s statement.

Judgment affirmed.

Bell, C. J., and Shulman, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

247 S.E.2d 211, 146 Ga. App. 628, 1978 Ga. App. LEXIS 2486, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hamm-v-state-gactapp-1978.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack