Hamm v. State

884 So. 2d 966, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 6981, 2004 WL 1109717
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 19, 2004·No. No. 4D04-536·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We sua sponte dismiss this appeal as untimely. This dismissal is without prejudice to appellant’s right to file a proper petition for belated appeal pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141. We do not reach the issue of whether [967]*967appellant is entitled to any exemption from the time limitations period under that rule.

FARMER, C.J., POLEN and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hamm v. State, 884 So. 2d 966, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 6981, 2004 WL 1109717 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

884 So. 2d 966 (Hamm v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.