Hamm v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

42 P.3d 1278, 145 Wash. 2d 1032, 2002 Wash. LEXIS 235
CourtWashington Supreme Court
DecidedApril 2, 2002
Docket70204-7
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 42 P.3d 1278 (Hamm v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hamm v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 42 P.3d 1278, 145 Wash. 2d 1032, 2002 Wash. LEXIS 235 (Wash. 2002).

Opinion

42 P.3d 1278 (2002)
145 Wash.2d 1032

Rebecca HAMM, Petitioner,
v.
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent.

No. 70204-7.

Supreme Court of Washington.

April 2, 2002.

ORDER

Department II of the Court (Justice Owens did not sit, Justice Madsen sat in her place) considered this matter at its April 2, 2002, Motion Calendar, and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

IT IS ORDERED:

That the Petition for Review is granted and remanded to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of Winters, 144 Wash.2d 869, 31 P.3d 1164 (2001).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hamm v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.
88 P.3d 395 (Washington Supreme Court, 2004)
Hamm v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
151 Wash. 2d 303 (Washington Supreme Court, 2004)
Safeco Ins. Co. v. Woodley
42 P.3d 1278 (Washington Supreme Court, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
42 P.3d 1278, 145 Wash. 2d 1032, 2002 Wash. LEXIS 235, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hamm-v-state-farm-mut-auto-ins-co-wash-2002.