Hamm v. GMRI, Inc.
772 So. 2d 633, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 16335, 2000 WL 1838371
Opinion
REVERSED. See Ford v. Southeast Atlantic Corp., 588 So.2d 1039 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991) (the Appeals Referee is the fact finder in unemployment compensation proceedings, and where the Appeals Referee’s decision is supported by competent substantial evidence, it must be upheld); see also Holloman v. City of Quincy, 664 So.2d 310 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995) (neither this court nor the Unemployment Appeals Commission may reweigh the evidence or substitute its findings for those of the Appeals Referee).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hamm v. GMRI, Inc., 772 So. 2d 633, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 16335, 2000 WL 1838371 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).
772 So. 2d 633 (Hamm v. GMRI, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ford v. Southeast Atlantic Corp.
588 So. 2d 1039 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Holloman v. City of Quincy
664 So. 2d 310 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)