Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Hamm v. GMRI, Inc.

Hamm v. GMRI, Inc.

772 So. 2d 633, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 16335, 2000 WL 1838371
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 15, 2000
DocketNo. 1D00-1208
StatusPublished

This text of 772 So. 2d 633 (Hamm v. GMRI, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hamm v. GMRI, Inc., 772 So. 2d 633, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 16335, 2000 WL 1838371 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

BROWNING, J.

REVERSED. See Ford v. Southeast Atlantic Corp., 588 So.2d 1039 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991) (the Appeals Referee is the fact finder in unemployment compensation proceedings, and where the Appeals Referee’s decision is supported by competent substantial evidence, it must be upheld); see also Holloman v. City of Quincy, 664 So.2d 310 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995) (neither this court nor the Unemployment Appeals Commission may reweigh the evidence or substitute its findings for those of the Appeals Referee).

ALLEN and BENTON, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ford v. Southeast Atlantic Corp.
588 So. 2d 1039 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Holloman v. City of Quincy
664 So. 2d 310 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
772 So. 2d 633, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 16335, 2000 WL 1838371, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hamm-v-gmri-inc-fladistctapp-2000.